Why is it a good time to build a new PC? | Tech Rasta


Earlier this month, my colleague Jacob Roche wrote an article about the worst time to build a PC in a period of time. Not because the price is so bad right now (not at all), but because the next model is. Just around the corner, new CPUs and GPUs will force retailers to sell older models at lower prices. Buying DDR4 for a dead-end platform is a bad idea, and DDR5 will continue to drop in price while we’re at it. Wait for the arrival of Ryzen 7000 and Intel Raptor Lake if you can wait a few months for the next generation. you will be much better or quarrel

I don’t agree. I think now is a really good time to build a PC. Because it’s hard to expect the next generation to be great. If you look at the last 5 years, it looks like we’re entering an era where you wouldn’t expect new CPUs and GPUs to offer better value than older ones. and while wanting to buy new platforms Instantly, with state-of-the-art features like DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0, it’s unlikely you’ll get your money’s worth.

Static price for a CPU

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D pins face up on the table.
Jacob Roach/Digital Trends

For most PC gaming history Newer hardware almost always offers better value than older hardware. This is usually due to mutual optimization and price reduction. However, we are entering a new era where value improvements continue to decline from generation to generation. And it’s starting to look more like a trend than a simple speed bump.

I want to talk about CPUs first, and I want to set the stage with AMD’s Bulldozer-powered FX CPU, released in 2011. The Bulldozer architecture is terrible at everything and has crippled AMD CPUs for years. From 2011 to 2017 Intel has a monopoly in the world of all x86 CPUs, including mainstream desktops. PC gamers will appreciate the same $330 quad-core Intel every year. with minor improvements in different versions

The release of Ryzen 1000 in 2017 is often seen as the beginning of a renaissance for desktop CPUs. And it’s not hard to understand why AMD is offering the eight-core Ryzen 7 1700 for $329, the same price as Intel’s flagship Core i7-7700K. Later that same year, Intel introduced its 8th-generation CPUs. Fast with more cores Switching between AMD and Intel has continued since then. Despite a brief hiatus in 2020 and 2021 due to Intel’s failure to promptly deliver 10nm CPUs.

It turns out we’re definitely not in the renaissance we thought we were. Even though AMD does offer noticeable performance gains on every model. But price is becoming an issue. The 8-core Ryzen 7 1700 launched for $329 in 2017, and that’s pretty good. But five years later, you’re paying the same amount for the Ryzen 7 5700X, which is also an eight-core CPU. The six-core CPU is still around $200 the same as it did in 2017.

Someone holding a Ryzen 7 5800X3D at a red light
Jacob Roach/Digital Trends

Ryzen 5000 in particular is not good for budget buyers. Budget options like the Ryzen 5 5500 and even the Ryzen 7 5700X haven’t arrived just a few months ago — almost two years after the first processors came out, AMD has given improvements to the lineup, but the pricier CPUs arrive too late. for party

Regarding Intel, we’ve seen MSRP increase more than stagnation. Up to the 7th generation, $329 was the limit, but starting with 8th Gen Intel started increasing both the number of cores and the price, the Core i7-8700K is a six-core CPU. Intel’s first was for the mainstream and was only 10% more expensive than the Core i7-7700K, but the next-generation Intel raised prices by nearly 40% with the release of a new performance level led by the Core i9-9900K. AMD followed suit, and now it’s not. Strange that CPUs like the Core i9-12900K sell for well over $600.

It’s hard to argue that price stagnation or MSRP increases for AMD and Intel CPUs are based purely on competition. AMD and Intel have been very competitive over the past five years in terms of performance, but AMD doesn’t. It has been forced to cut prices and Intel continues to raise prices for its flagship parts. While those flagships aren’t as competitive (see Core i9-11900K), AMD and Intel seem to be serving more and more high-paying users. while ignoring the cheaper segments of the market

The death of budget GPUs

Two graphics cards stacked on top of each other.
Jacob Roach/Digital Trends

GPUs haven’t performed well in the past five years. Ever since Nvidia released their awesome GTX 10-series, both Nvidia and AMD have released several low-value GPUs, and all but the low-end and mid-range segments. Despite some interesting launches, AMD and Nvidia have made it clear that value is not the focus.

It all started with the RTX 20-series, yes, it introduced ray tracing and AI upscaling to the mainstream. But with few games supporting these features. The price of the 20 Series is unbearable. The RTX 2080 at $699 is a worse deal than the GTX 1080 at $499, which is just 11% faster. For over $200, I don’t think there was a GPU series before this model. It offers really worse value than its predecessor, and I see the RTX 20 Series as a turning point in desktop GPUs.

As someone who bought an RX 480 in 2016, it’s depressing to see that there isn’t a GPU worth upgrading to for the same price.

The RTX 20-series represents a shift in Nvidia’s behavior where increasing the bang for the buck isn’t a big deal anymore. And although it doesn’t affect the high-end much Budget GPUs used to start at $100 and you can get a decent budget GPU for around $150, but today Nvidia’s cheapest 30-series GPU is the RTX 3050 at $150. $249 You don’t get your money’s worth on the 3050; the GTX 1650 Super from 2019 is $159, and the 3050 is only 30% faster.

And we don’t need to talk about the downfall of the GTX 1630.

It looks like AMD is following in Nvidia’s footsteps and is also downgrading. One good example is the RX 6500 XT, which is supposed to replace the RX 5500 XT. The problem? The 5500 XT comes with 8GB of VRAM, while the 6500 XT only comes with 4GB. It’s also faster than the five-year-old RX 580, which comes with 8GB of VRAM, too. All of these GPUs launch at $200 and deliver performance. close together As someone who bought the RX 480 in 2016, the trend is pretty depressing to see the RX 480 is 6 years old and AMD hasn’t released a GPU worth upgrading at the same price point.

It’s possible that the supply chain issues caused by the pandemic have contributed to AMD and Nvidia’s lack of budget options on this model. That doesn’t mean things will go back to normal once those issues go away. AMD and Nvidia may have decided things were going well without offering a low-cost GPU. bigger and more which is good for business

Don’t be adopted first.

Intel Core i9-12900K in motherboard
Jacob Roach/Digital Trends

Intel’s LGA 1700 socket debuts DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, and AMD plans to follow suit with its upcoming AM5 socket. Upgrading to take advantage of these features is certainly a compelling one. but in general It’s not worth being an early user. When it comes to technology

DDR5 has been on the market for a while now. And with Intel’s 12th-generation Alder Lake CPUs, you can choose between the newer DDR5 and the older DDR4. If you have an Alder Lake CPU, going with DDR5 won’t give you more performance, making DDR4 a much better value. Most DDR4s are half the price of a DDR5 kit of the same size. It’s true that DDR5 will be cheaper and faster in the future, but DDR4 is cheap these days and performs well.

PCIe 5.0 is definitely an improvement over PCIe 4.0, providing twice the bandwidth. But more bandwidth only translates to more efficiency if the device is designed to take advantage of it. The extra bandwidth is just right for an SSD, and there’s no doubt that fast PCIe 5.0 SSDs will be available soon, but PCIe 5.0 for GPUs sometimes isn’t necessary. We saw the same thing happen with PCIe 4.0, where the main selling point was the real SSD, not the GPU.

Finally, consider a teething problem platform with new technologies that are often available. New features cannot be fully tested before they are released to the world. Therefore, it is more likely that users building PCs on these new platforms will see at least one or two bugs. I think with the price The lack of use of these features initially And the high likelihood of errors means older platforms based on DDR4 and PCIe 4.0 still perform very well.

i hope i am wrong

High performance and custom MSI computer builds
WildSnap/Shutterstock

I want the next generation to take us back to the old path. I’d like the Ryzen 7000 and Raptor Lake to launch at a good price, and look at the new AMD and Intel CPUs covering the entire stack from low-end to high-end. I want AMD and Nvidia to bring back good budget and mid-range GPUs with their upcoming RX 7000 and RTX 40 GPUs.

I don’t see what’s going on with what I’ve seen in the last 5 years. The big three have made great strides in technology. But you can no longer enjoy that advance unless you are willing to pay hundreds of dollars. So buy your CPU and GPU while it’s cheap because it won’t last forever.

Editor’s recommendation








Source link