4 ways the PC government’s new home law could replace city powers | Tech Rasta

[ad_1]

No elections in recent years where housing prices are not a hot issue. including the municipality of Ontario that held last Monday.

No one promised to be too harsh during the campaign. But when the elections in the city ended The provincial government blindfolded newly elected municipal officials and council members with a comprehensive new law expected to pass in the short term.

Cities are struggling to find out what Bill 23, also known as the “More Homes Built Faster Act,” means for them.

They were sure of one thing: the new progressive conservative government law replaced some municipal powers that had to oversee their own city planning.

Steve Clark, Minister for Municipal Affairs and Housing said on Tuesday that it was necessary. Due to local pressures, it is almost impossible to increase housing supply fast enough.

“We’re at BANANA’s point where it ‘builds nothing near anyone,'” Clarke said earlier this week.

Really? A few days ago? The Ottawa Council’s Planning Commission approved more than 4,500 units in a single meeting, including: 950 near wetlandsThat’s on top of the 41,000 units the board has approved in the past. But the developers have not built it yet. Not to mention the 69,000 homes that can be built on land that are serviced and ready to go.

Ontario’s Minister for Housing Announces Proposal Changes to New House Building Rules

There is no “silver bullet” to deal with the provincial housing crisis. But Housing Secretary Steve Clark said on Tuesday the government has a long-term plan to build more homes as long as other governments buy them in.

The province is targeting 151,000 new homes for Ottawa by 2031. How they will actually get developers to build more homes, decisions often based on market forces such as interest rates and labor supply, have yet to be resolved.

But it seems the Ford government is ready to implement several municipal statutes to make it easier to build.

Here are four ways the province is preventing local officials from approving new housing.

1. Affordable housing destroy city facilities

New law gives developers incentives to build affordable housing which is a commendable goal But one way of doing it could be to plunder millions of essential cities to build everything from roads and pipes. to the library and recreation center.

Development costs (DCs) are fees that cities apply to most new construction in the city. The money was put into cauldrons throughout the city. And all this is allocated by law for different types of infrastructure. (on Tuesday Clark suggests that the Ontario municipality is sitting on $8 billion in DC reserves. as if it were a city mud fund instead of legit money for a specific purpose)

Many road construction projects pay for development costs. (Kate Porter/CBC)

The province will waive these fees for affordable and attainable housing. (“Affordable” means 80 percent of the average market rent or purchase price, while “acquired” is a home that costs less than 30 percent of a person’s gross income. How does all of this work in the real world? It’s not, but it’s obvious.)

These exempt fees are worth millions of dollars. This will be used to pay for infrastructure to support growth. Where will the lost income come from? The city has several ways to earn money — fees and taxes. Failure to reimburse this amount could have a significant impact on the facilities in this city.

Now, provinces may choose to use one of these powers, such as tax breaks. to incentivize developers to build affordable units The Ford government is recommending money from the federal housing accelerator fund $4 billion to reimburse the city for lost DCs.

The central government has been silent about the province’s idea of ​​using housing money.

2. Little money for the park

The province also seems to believe that the way to make homes more affordable is to allocate less garden space.

in the suburbs The city requires developers to allocate one hectare of land for every 300 units built. The new law requires 1 hectare of land per 600 units. In other words, the province will divide the area needed for parks in half.

In the core there is not much land for the park. Developers have to pay the so-called cash instead of the park. The city saves until it has enough to buy or develop land into a green community.

A group of people with children under a tree with autumn colored leaves.
The new provincial law will limit the amount of garden space or cash instead of gardens that cities can collect from new developments. (Jacques Corrivo/CBC)

Bill 23 appears to undermine this in many ways. It will limit the amount a city can charge for its gardens. And it will force the municipality to use 60 percent of the garden reserves every year. That would make it incredibly difficult to buy a garden in an inner city where land is expensive.

And finally, the province will waive all garden area requirements for affordable and accessible housing. But there are no plans to solve the shortage of cities.

3. Overcome R1 zoning

The province appears to be ending R1 zoning, a rule that only allows single-family homes to be built on dwellings. When the draft law is approved Up to three residential buildings become automatic rights for property owners.

The idea is that the local council has no political will to eliminate R1 demarcation. Indeed, several candidates in our last election defended the exemption. But why should a gigantic single-family home be built to line the lottery? But not a similar sized building with three apartments.

Three-unit homes, such as Westboro’s Three Semi-detached homes, are permitted in single-family homes, semi-detached homes and townhomes across the city under Bill 23. (Eric Milligan)

This change isn’t just for single-family homes. Twin houses and townhouses can have three apartments. The city now has doping rules that speak of defeat and landscaping. For example, to avoid paving the road in front of the house. But these rules only apply to units within the Greenbelt. The new province rules will apply to houses throughout the city.

4. A city not to mention design.

The new law could seriously limit the city’s powers to control the exterior of a building. The planning process, known as site plan supervision, is often the last step in a project before applying for a building permit. The sitemap includes everything about the exterior of the building. From landscaping, parking, to building design.

For any building with less than 10 units, the province cancels all sitemap controls. (See Triple Concerns above.) And for larger buildings, Bill 23 declares that “exterior design is no longer a subject to control over site plans.”

That means city officials have no control over issues such as architecture, size, appearance or sustainable design features. or environmental design rules (e.g. requiring green roofs in large buildings).

Eliminating all or part of the city’s involvement in the area plan may speed development approval. But how will the long-term effects affect the livability and sustainability of cities?

[ad_2]

Source link